What’s math got to do with it?

Jo Boaler is a well known scholar within the field of mathematics education research, and she has written several books and articles related to the teaching and learning of mathematics. On June 30, a book called “What’s Math Got to Do with It?: How Parents and Teachers Can Help Children Learn to Love Their Least Favorite Subject” will be released. I have read previous books and articles that Boaler has written, and I have even had the privilege of attending one of her lectures (at ICME-10 in Copenhagen), so I am sure this book will also be worth reading! Here is a copy of the product description from Amazon:

A recent assessment of mathematics performance around the world ranked the United States twenty-eighth out of forty countries in the study. When the level of spending was taken into account, we sank to the very bottom of the list. We are falling rapidly behind the rest of the developed world when it comes to math education—and the consequences are dire.

In this straightforward and inspiring book, Jo Boaler, a professor of mathematics education at Stanford for nine years, outlines concrete solutions that can change things for the better, including classroom approaches, essential strategies for students, and advice for parents. This is a must-read for anyone who is interested in the mathematical and scientific future of our country.

Preview of TMME, July 2009

The July issue of The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast will soon be published. Editor Bharath Sriraman has provided me with a preview of what appears to be a very interesting issue:

THE MONTANA MATHEMATICS ENTHUSIAST
ISSN 1551-3440
Vol.6, No.3, July 2009

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Editorial Information

0. THE JOURNAL (WHEEL) KEEPS ON TURNING
Bharath Sriraman (USA)

FEATURE ARTICLES

1. TWO APPLICATIONS OF ART TO GEOMETRY
Viktor Blåsjö (Sweden/USA)

2. INTUITIONS OF “INFINITE NUMBERS”: INFINITE MAGNITUDE VS. INFINITE REPRESENTATION
Ami Mamolo (Canada)

3. ON THE USE OF REALISTIC FERMI PROBLEMS FOR INTRODUCING MATHEMATICAL MODELLING IN SCHOOL
Jonas Bergman Ärlebäck (Sweden)

4. MATHEMATICAL BEAUTY AND ITS CHARACTERISTICS- A STUDY ON THE STUDENT’S POINT OF VIEW
Astrid Brinkmann (Germany)

5. AN APPLICATION OF GRÖBNER BASES
Shengxiang Xia and Gaoxiang Xia (China)

6. SMALL CHANGE – BIG DIFFERENCE
Ilana Lavy and Atara Shriki (Israel)

7. MATHEMATICAL CURIOSITIES ABOUT DIVISION OF INTEGERS
Jérôme Proulx and Mary Beisiegel (Canada)

8. HELPING TEACHERS UN-STRUCTURE: A PROMISING APPROACH
Eric Hsu, Judy Kysh, Katherine Ramage, and Diane Resek (USA)

9. WHO CAN SOLVE 2x=1? AN ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE LOAD RELATED TO LEARNING LINEAR EQUATION SOLVING
Timo Tossavainen (Finland)

10. IF MATHEMATICS IS A LANGUAGE, HOW DO YOU SWEAR IN IT?
Dave Wagner (Canada)

11. FROM TRAPEZOIDS TO THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF CALCULUS
William Gratzer and Srilal Krishnan (USA)

12. GRAPH ISOMORPHISMS AND MATRIX SIMILARITY: SWITCHING BETWEEN REPRESENTATIONS
Thierry Dana-Picard (Israel)

13. SUM OF “N” CONSECUTIVE INTEGERS
Steve Humble (UK)

14. THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF COMPREHENSION TESTS TO COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS: A CASE STUDY
Yüksel Dede (Turkey)

MONTANA FEATURE

15. CUBISM AND THE FOURTH DIMENSION
Elijah Bodish (Missoula, Montana)

BOOK REVIEW
16. WHAT’S ALL THE COMMOTION OVER COMMOGNITION? A REVIEW OF ANNA SFARD’S THINKING AS COMMUNICATING

PhD student at UiS?

My university – University of Stavanger, Norway – has now announced a vacant position/stipend for a PhD student in mathematics education. The position is related to our project “Teachers’ knowledge of mathematics” (which represents an attempt to adapt and use the MKT measures in Norway).

For more information (the website is in Norwegian only) you can contact me (reidar.mosvold_AT_uis.no) or my colleague Raymond Bjuland (raymond.bjuland_AT_uis.no). Please note that the deadline for application is June 29, 2009!

Students’ fraction comparison strategies

Doug M. Clarke and Anne Roche have written an article entitled Students’ fraction comparison strategies as a window into robust understanding and possible pointers for instruction. The article was published online in Educational Studies in Mathematics on Friday. Here is a copy of the article’s abstract:

As part of individual interviews incorporating whole number and rational number tasks, 323 grade 6 children in Victoria, Australia were asked to nominate the larger of two fractions for eight pairs, giving reasons for their choice. All tasks were expected to be undertaken mentally. The relative difficulty of the pairs was found to be close to that predicted, with the exception of fractions with the same numerators and different denominators, which proved surprisingly difficult. Students who demonstrated the greatest success were likely to use benchmark (transitive) and residual thinking. It is hypothesised that the methods of these successful students could form the basis of instructional approaches which may yield the kind of connected understanding promoted in various curriculum documents and required for the development of proportional reasoning in later years.

Students’ whole number multiplicative concepts

Amy J. Hackenberga and Erik S. Tillema have written an article entitled Students’ whole number multiplicative concepts: A critical constructive resource for fraction composition schemes. The article was published online in The Journal of Mathematical Behavior on Thursday. Here is the abstract of their article:

This article reports on the activity of two pairs of sixth grade students who participated in an 8-month teaching experiment that investigated the students’ construction of fraction composition schemes. A fraction composition scheme consists of the operations and concepts used to determine, for example, the size of 1/3 of 1/5 of a whole in relation to the whole. Students’ whole number multiplicative concepts were found to be critical constructive resources for students’ fraction composition schemes. Specifically, the interiorization of two levels of units, a particular multiplicative concept, was found to be necessary for the construction of a unit fraction composition scheme, while the interiorization of three levels of units was necessary for the construction of a general fraction composition scheme. These findings contribute to previous research on students’ construction of fraction multiplication that has emphasized partitioning and conceptualizing quantitative units. Implications of the findings for teaching are considered.

Hackenberg, A. J., & Tillema, E. S. (n.d.). Students’ whole number multiplicative concepts: A critical constructive resource for fraction composition schemes. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, In Press, Corrected Proof. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.04.004.

Understanding rigid geometric transformations

Huseyin Bahadir Yanika and Alfinio Flores have written an article called Understanding rigid geometric transformations: Jeff’s learning path for translation. The article has recently been publishedin The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. Here is the abstract of their article:

This article describes the development of knowledge and understanding of translations of Jeff, a prospective elementary teacher, during a teaching experiment that also included other rigid transformations. His initial conceptions of translations and other rigid transformations were characterized as undefined motions of a single object. He conceived of transformations as movement and showed no indication about what defines a transformation. The results of the study indicate that the development of his thinking about translations and other rigid transformations followed an order of (1) transformations as undefined motions of a single object, (2) transformations as defined motions of a single object, and (3) transformations as defined motions of all points on the plane. The case of Jeff is part of a bigger study that included four prospective teachers and analyzed their development in understanding of rigid transformations. The other participants also showed a similar evolution.

Yanik, H. B., & Flores, A. (n.d.). Understanding rigid geometric transformations: Jeff’s learning path for translation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, In Press, Corrected Proof. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.04.003.

The effects of cooperative learning

Kamuran Tarim has written an article entitled The effects of cooperative learning on preschoolers’ mathematics problem-solving ability. The article was published online in Educational Studies in Mathematics on Tuesday. Here is the abstract of the article:

The aim of this study is to investigate the efficiency of cooperative learning on preschoolers’ verbal mathematics problem-solving abilities and to present the observational findings of the related processes and the teachers’ perspectives about the application of the program. Two experimental groups and one control group participated in the study. Results found that preschoolers in the experimental groups experienced larger improvements in their problem-solving abilities than those in the control group. Findings also revealed that the cooperative learning method can be successfully applied in teaching verbal mathematics problem-solving skills during the preschool period. The preschoolers’ skills regarding cooperation, sharing, listening to the speaker and fulfilling individual responsibilities in group work improved. The teachers’ points of view also supported these findings.

Tarim, K. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning on preschoolers’ mathematics problem-solving ability. Educational Studies in Mathematics. doi: 10.1007/s10649-009-9197-x. 

Jump or compensate?

Joke Torbeyns, Bert De Smedt, Pol Ghesquière and Lieven Verschaffel have written an article entitled Jump or compensate? Strategy flexibility in the number domain up to 100. This article was published online in ZDM on Friday. Here is the abstract of their article:

This study investigates elementary school children’s flexible use of mental calculation strategies on additions and subtractions in the number domain 20–100. Sixty third-graders of three different mathematical achievement levels individually solved a series of 2-digit additions and subtractions in one choice and two no-choice conditions. In the choice condition, children could choose between the compensation (56 + 29 = ?; 56 + 30 = 86, 86 − 1 = 85) and jump strategy (56 + 29 = ?; 56 + 20 = 76, 76 + 9 = 85) on each item. In the two no-choice conditions, children had to solve each item with either the compensation or the jump strategy. The results demonstrated that children of all achievement levels spontaneously applied both the compensation and the jump strategy to solve the items from the choice condition. Furthermore, they all executed the compensation strategy equally accurately, but faster than the jump strategy in the no-choice conditions. Finally, children neither took into account the expected task nor individual strategy efficiency characteristics during the strategy choice process. Results are discussed in terms of recent models of adaptive strategy choices and instructional practices in the number domain 20–100.

Experts’ strategy flexibility for solving equations

Jon R. Star and Kristie J. Newton have written an article about The nature and development of experts’ strategy flexibility for solving equations. The article was published online in ZDM last week. Algebra is an area of mathematics in which many pupils struggle. There is also an agreement among many researchers that proficiency in algebra includes understanding as well as skills. This study aims at investigating the flexibility of experts’ strategies when solving algebraic equations. Eight experts in school algebra were participating in the study, and their flexibility was measured using a researcher-designed algebra test as well as semi-structured interviews. These interviews were conducted immediately after the participants had completed the test.

Here is the abstract of their article:

Largely absent from the emerging literature on flexibility is a consideration of experts’ flexibility. Do experts exhibit strategy flexibility, as one might assume? If so, how do experts perceive that this capacity developed in themselves? Do experts feel that flexibility is an important instructional outcome in school mathematics? In this paper, we describe results from several interviews with experts to explore strategy flexibility for solving equations. We conducted interviews with eight content experts, where we asked a number of questions about flexibility and also engaged the experts in problem solving. Our analysis indicates that the experts that were interviewed did exhibit strategy flexibility in the domain of linear equation solving, but they did not consistently select the most efficient method for solving a given equation. However, regardless of whether these experts used the best method on a given problem, they nevertheless showed an awareness of and an appreciation of efficient and elegant problem solutions. The experts that we spoke to were capable of making subtle judgments about the most appropriate strategy for a given problem, based on factors including mental and rapid testing of strategies, the problem solver’s goals (e.g., efficiency, error-free execution, elegance) and familiarity with a given problem type. Implications for future research on flexibility and on mathematics instruction are discussed.

Professional development + coaching = enhanced teaching

Loretta C. Rudd, Matthew C. Lambert, Macy Satterwhite and Cinda H. Smith have written an article entitled: Professional Development + Coaching = Enhanced Teaching: Increasing Usage of Math Mediated Language in Preschool Classrooms. The article was published online in Early Childhood Education Journal last Thursday. Here is the abstract of their article:

In an effort to determine the most efficacious manner to deliver professional development training to early childhood educators, this study investigated the effect of a 2-h workshop followed by side-by-side classroom coaching. Twelve early childhood educators with 4-year degrees teaching in a university child development center participated in the study. The twice weekly classroom observations were analyzed for the use of math mediated language. Results indicate a 56% increase of math mediated language following the professional development; however, the greatest increase (39% increase over professional development condition) occurred during the side-by-side coaching phase of the treatment. These results corroborate previous findings that implementation of teaching strategies presented in professional development trainings can be enhanced by coaching teachers on the use of the strategies.