The struggle to "fix" math education

It is not entirely new, but I just discovered it: a very nice little video from the National Science Foundation about “The struggle to ‘fix’ math education in the US”. The video is interesting from many perspectives, but for me it is particularly interesting because two of the three people that are featured in this film played an important role in the symposium where I gave my own presentation at this year’s AERA conference. Bill Schmidt was one of our two discussants, and Deborah Ball was chair of our session. Along with Joan Ferrini-Mundi from NSF, they raise some important issues for mathematics education research in this video:

The video was created in relation to the NSF special report, Math: What’s the problem?

Sexy maths

I have already written about this year’s Abel Prize winner, Mikhail Gromov in earlier posts, but an article by Marcus du Sautoy in Times Online motivated an addition to the earlier posts. The article is called “Sexy maths: Drawing parallels in geometry”. In this article, du Sautoy claims that Gromov has made

(…) some of the most revolutionary contributtions to geometry since those of Euclid.

The article gives an interesting insight into some of the most important aspects of the historical development of geometry, with Euclid’s parallel postulate as a pivotal point. An excellent article by du Sautoy, who is a mathematician himself.

6 out of 10 university students have math anxiety

I learned about this through Deb Russel’s blog over at About.com. A Spanish study reveals that:

Six out of every 10 university students, regardless their field of study, present symptoms of anxiety when it comes to dealing with mathematics

Some details about the study reveals that:

The researchers assessed the students using the Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitudes Scales, a questionnaire validated by experts from all over the world which has been used since the 70s. The students took the questionnaire at the beginning of the second four-month period of school.

These are interesting results. Math anxiety should definitely be taken seriously, and a person’s attitudes towards mathematics are important, regardless if they are related to anxiety or not. I have done a much more informal study of my own students in early childhood education over the last couple of years, and almost half of them find mathematics boring and/or difficult. If some of them even have math anxiety, I think this will strongly impact their work as future teachers, kindergarten teachers or whatever they will end up doing!


Effect of personalization

Mojeed K. Akinsola and Adeneye O.A. Awofala have written an article about the Effect of personalization of instruction on students’ achievement and self-efficacy in mathematics word problems. This article was published in the last issue of International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. Here is their abstract:

This study investigated the effect of personalized print-based instruction on the achievement and self-efficacy regarding mathematics word problems of 320 senior secondary students in Nigeria. The moderator effect of gender was also examined on independent variable (personalization) and dependent variables (mathematics word problem achievement and self-efficacy). The t-test statistic was used to analyse the data collected for the study. The results showed that significant differences existed in the mathematics word problem achievement and self-efficacy beliefs of personalized and non-personalized groups, male and female personalized groups and male and female non-personalized groups.

More about the Abel Prize winner

A few days ago, I wrote about the winner of this year’s Abel Prize: Mikail Gromov. Since then, a couple of other posts or articles have been published about this. The Chronicle of Higher Education published a small article about it. Today, a very interesting article was posted by someone who would be able to understand Gromov’s achievements better than most of us: Terence Tao. Professor Tao points to earlier articles he has written about Gromov’s theories, and he presents one of Gromov’s results along with a sketch of the original proof. So, if your mathematical skills are somewhat above average, you might be interested in taking a closer look at this 🙂

The Abel Prize 2009 – Mikhail Gromov

Russian mathematician Mikhail Gromov has been awarded the 2009 Abel Prize. The announcement of the first Abel Prize was made in 2002, in connection with the 200th anniversary of Norwegian mathematician Niels Henrik Abel‘s birth. Although the prize has a fairly recent history, it is already called “The Mathematicians’ Nobel“. The idea of having an annual mathematics prize like this was proposed as early as in 1899 by Norwegian mathematician Sophus Lie, when it was made clear that there would be no Nobel prize in mathematics. These early attempts ended for several reasons, amongst others because Sophus Lie himself died in this same year (1899), and the dissolution of the union between Sweden and Norway in 1905 also made it difficult to create such a prize.

Mikhail Gromov (born 1943) was announced as this year’s winner today, by the President of the Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, Øyvind Østerud. Gromov will receive the prize from His Majesty King Harald in a ceremony in Oslo, May 19. The prize carries a cash award of NOK 6,000,000 (about USD 950,000). Gromov was given the prize because of his revolutionary contributions to the field of geometry.

My guess is by the way, that the rather small Wikipedia article about Gromov will increase in the next couple of days 🙂

Sources:
http://www.abelprisen.no/en/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikhail_Gromov
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abel_prize

Anniversary!!!

I can hardly believe that it is only a little more than a year since I started this blog! It has been a great learning experience for me, and hopefully for someone else as well. I just found out that I have actually reached my 400th post, which is quite an anniversary! So, happy 400 🙂

Khayyam with Cabri

Adnan Baki and Bulent Guven have written an article about the interesting link between Persian mathematician, philosopher, astronomer and poet Omar Khayyam (1048-1122) and the dynamic geometry application Cabri. The article was recently published in Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, and it is entitled Khayyam with Cabri: experiences of pre-service mathematics teachers with Khayyam’s solution of cubic equations in dynamic geometry environment. Here is the abstract of their article:

The study reported in this article deals with the observed actions of Turkish pre-service mathematics teachers in dynamic geometry environment (DGE) as they were learning Khayyam’s method for solving cubic equations formed as x3 + ax = b. Having learned the method, modelled it in DGE and verified the correctness of the solution, students generated their own methods for solving different types of cubic equations such as x3 + ax2 = b and x3 + a = bx in the light of Khayyam’s method. With the presented teaching experiment, students realized that Khayyam’s mathematics is different from theirs. We consider that this gave them an opportunity to have an insight about the cultural and social aspects of mathematics. In addition, the teaching experiment showed that dynamic geometry software is an excellent tool for doing mathematics because of their dynamic nature and accurate constructions. And, it can be easily concluded that the history of mathematics is useful resource for enriching mathematics learning environment.