Catwalk problems

Three articles have been published in The Journal of Mathematical Behavior recently that are all related to “the catwalk task”.

1. Steven Case: The catwalk task: Reflections and synthesis: Part 1
Abstract: In this article I recount my experiences with a series of encounters with the catwalk task and reflect on the professional growth that these opportunities afforded. First, I reflect on my own mathematical work on the catwalk task, including my efforts to fit various algebraic models to the data. Second, I reflect on my experiences working with a group of high school students on the catwalk task and my interpretations of their mathematical thinking. Finally, I reflect on the entire experience with the catwalk problem, as a mathematics learner, as a teacher, and as a professional.

2. Emiliano Vega and Shawn Hicks: The catwalk task: Reflections and synthesis: Part 2
Abstract: In this article we recount our experiences with a series of encounters with the catwalk task and reflect on the professional growth that these opportunities afforded. First, we individually reflect on our own mathematical work on the catwalk task. Second, we reflect on our experiences working with a group of community college students on the catwalk task and our interpretations of their mathematical thinking. In so doing we also detail a number of innovative and novel student-generated representations of the catwalk photos. Finally, we each individually reflect on the entire experience with the catwalk problem, as mathematics learners, as teachers, and as professionals.

3. Chris Rasmussen: Multipurpose Professional Growth Sequence: The catwalk problem as a paradigmatic example
Abstract: An important concern in mathematics teacher education is how to create learning opportunities for prospective and practicing teachers that make a difference in their professional growth as educators. The first purpose of this article is to describe one way of working with prospective and practicing teachers in a graduate mathematics education course that holds promise for positively influencing the way teachers think about mathematics, about student learning, and about mathematics teaching. Specifically, I use the “catwalk” task as an example of how a single problem can serve as the basis for a coherent sequence of professional learning experiences. A second purpose of this article is to provide background information that contextualizes the subsequent two articles, each of which details the positive influence of the catwalk task sequence on the authors’ professional growth.

So, you may ask, what is this catwalk problem really about then? The problem is originated in a set of 24 time-lapse photographs of a running cat. The question is simply: How fast is the cat moving at frame 10? Frame 20? (See this pdf for a presentation of the problem!)

NOMAD, December 2008

The December issue of Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education (NOMAD) has already reached the subscribers (in the paper format). Now, it has also appeared online – or at least the abstracts. Here is the list of contents:

GeoGebra – freedom to explore and learn

Linda Fahlberg-Stojanovska and Vitomir Stojanovski have written an article called GeoGebra – freedom to explore and learn. The article was recently published in Teaching Mathematics and its Applications. GeoGebra is a very interesting piece of software, and if you are interested in more, the authors point you to this wiki. Here is the abstract of their article:

We start by visiting the maths section of the web site answers.yahoo.com. Here, anybody can ask a question from anywhere in the world at every possible level. Answers are given by anyone who wants to contribute and then askers/readers rate the responses. A brief look here and it is starkly clear that our young people are struggling and their ability to think logically—that is understand a problem, organize data into knowns and unknowns, explore possibilities and assess solutions is definitely on the decline. In our opinion, this is more insidious than the actual decline in their overall mathematics skills. Further, one is struck by the fact that technology seems to be contributing to this decline when in fact it should be the opposite. We then examine two question/answer cycles in detail and show how the freeware GeoGebra (www.geogebra.org GeoGebraWiki: http://www.geogebra.org/wiki GeoGebraForum: http://www.geogebra.org/forum)—which gives the freedom to explore and learn to everyone, everywhere and at any time—can be of tremendous value to pupils and students in their understanding of mathematics from the smallest ages on up.

An innovative system of lecture notes

E.J. Tonkes, P.S. Isaac and V. Scharaschkin have written an article entitled “Assessment of an innovative system of lecture notes in first-year mathematics“. The article was recently published online in International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. Here is the abstract of their article:

Lectures are a familiar component in the delivery of mathematical content. Lecturers are often challenged with presenting material in a manner that aligns with the various learning styles and abilities within a large class. Students complain that the old-fashioned lecture style of copying notes from a board hinders the learning process, as they simply concentrate on writing. In recent times, distributing elaborate lecture notes has become a widespread alternative, but has its own problems, alienating the audience with lack of participation. The authors have developed a system of lecture notes, we call partially populated lecture notes, that have enjoyed success with students and addressed these difficulties.

Knowledge and beliefs

Much of my own research the last years has been related to knowledge and beliefs concerning mathematics, teaching and learning of mathematics. In the most recent issue of Instructional Science, Angela Boldrin and Lucia Mason have written an article that caught my attention: Distinguishing between knowledge and beliefs: students’ epistemic criteria for differentiating. Here is the abstract of this highly interesting article:

“I believe that he/she is telling the truth”, “I know about the solar system”: what epistemic criteria do students use to distinguish between knowledge and beliefs? If knowing and believing are conceptually distinguishable, do students of different grade levels use the same criteria to differentiate the two constructs? How do students understand the relationship between the two constructs? This study involved 219 students (116 girls and 103 boys); 114 were in 8th grade and 105 in 13th grade. Students had to (a) choose which of 5 graphic representations outlined better the relationship between the two constructs and to justify their choice; (b) rate a list of factual/validated, non-factual/non-validated and ambiguous statements as either knowledge or belief, and indicate for each statement their degree of truthfulness, acceptance and on which sources their views were based. Qualitative and quantitative analysis were performed. The data showed how students distinguish knowledge from belief conceptually and justify their understanding of the relationship between the two constructs. Although most students assigned a higher epistemic status to knowledge, school grade significantly differentiated the epistemic criteria used to distinguish the two constructs. The study indicates the educational importance of considering the notions of knowledge and belief that students bring into the learning situation.

The emergence of "speaking with meaning"

Phillip G. Clark, Kevin C. Moore and Marilyn P. Carlson have written an article that was recently published online in The Journal of Mathematical Behavior. The article is entitled Documenting the emergence of “speaking with meaning” as a sociomathematical norm in professional learning community discourse. Here is the abstract of their article:

We introduce the sociomathematical norm of speaking with meaning and describe its emergence in a professional learning community (PLC) of secondary mathematics and science teachers. We use speaking with meaning to reference specific attributes of individual communication that have been revealed to improve the quality of discourse among individuals engaged in discourse in a PLC. An individual who is speaking with meaning provides conceptually based descriptions when communicating with others about solution approaches. The quantities and relationships between quantities in the problem context are described rather than only stating procedures or numerical calculations used to obtain an answer to a problem. Solution approaches are justified with logical and coherent arguments that have a conceptual rather than procedural basis. The data for this research was collected during a year-long study that investigated a PLC whose members were secondary mathematics and science teachers. Analysis of the data revealed that after one semester of participating in a PLC where speaking with meaning was emphasized, the PLC members began to establish their own criteria for an acceptable mathematical argument and what constituted speaking with meaning. The group also emerged with common expectations that answers be accompanied by explanations and mathematical operations be explained conceptually (not just procedurally). The course and PLC design that supported the emergence of speaking with meaning by individuals participating in a PLC are described.

Working with schools

Alan H. Schoenfeld has written an article that was published in the March issue of American Mathematical Monthly. The article has been entitled: Working with Schools: The Story of a Mathematics Education Collaboration. Here is a copy of the article abstract:

Working for meaningful mathematical change in the schools isn’t easy. There are issues of politics, turf, and sometimes unreasonable expectations on the part of the school district and the volunteers who work with it. But with good intentions, goodwill, and tenacity, there are ways to make a difference. This paper describes some of the ups, the downs, and the ultimate progress in a collaboration between U.C. Berkeley and the Berkeley Unified School district. It offers lessons to mathematicians who want to understand and/or work with their local schools.

Proof constructions and evaluations

Andreas J. Stylianides and Gabriel J. Stylianides have written an article called Proof construction and evaluations. The article was published online in Educational Studies in Mathematics on Friday. Here is a copy of their article abstract:

In this article, we focus on a group of 39 prospective elementary (grades K-6) teachers who had rich experiences with proof, and we examine their ability to construct proofs and evaluate their own constructions. We claim that the combined “construction–evaluation” activity helps illuminate certain aspects of prospective teachers’ and presumably other individuals’ understanding of proof that tend to defy scrutiny when individuals are asked to evaluate given arguments. For example, some prospective teachers in our study provided empirical arguments to mathematical statements, while being aware that their constructions were invalid. Thus, although these constructions considered alone could have been taken as evidence of an empirical conception of proof, the additional consideration of prospective teachers’ evaluations of their own constructions overruled this interpretation and suggested a good understanding of the distinction between proofs and empirical arguments. We offer a possible account of our findings, and we discuss implications for research and instruction.