The December issue of Educational Researcher has been published, and it is a special issue on Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. The issue contains 13 interesting articles with a focus on the Math Panel Report:
- Anthony E. Kelly: Reflections on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Final Report
- Hilda Borko and Jennifer A. Whitcomb: Teachers, Teaching, and Teacher Education: Comments on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel’s Report
- Paul Cobb and Kara Jackson: The Consequences of Experimentalism in Formulating Recommendations for Policy and Practice in Mathematics Education
- Patrick W. Thompson: On Professional Judgment and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report: Curricular Content
- Jo Boaler: When Politics Took the Place of Inquiry: A Response to the National Mathematics Advisory Panel’s Review of Instructional Practices
- Joanne Lobato: On Learning Processes and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report
- Lorrie A. Shepard: Commentary on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Recommendations on Assessment
- Jeremy Roschelle, Corinne Singleton, Nora Sabelli, Roy Pea, and John D. Bransford: Mathematics Worth Knowing, Resources Worth Growing, Research Worth Noting: A Response to the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report
- James G. Greeno and Allan Collins: Commentary on the Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel
- Finbarr C. Sloane: Randomized Trials in Mathematics Education: Recalibrating the Proposed High Watermark
- Jere Confrey, Alan P. Maloney, and Kenny H. Nguyen: Breaching the Conditions for Success for a National Advisory Panel
- James P. Spillane: Policy, Politics, and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report: Topology, Functions, and Limits
- Camilla Persson Benbow and Larry R. Faulkner: Rejoinder to the Critiques of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Final Report
Reidar Mosvold 